[DISCONTINUED] Citizens with a nurse practitioner as their primary care provider who reported that their nurse practitioner always involves them in decisions about their health care

Table

Unit %

Year 2020
Province
New Brunswick
79.7
76.3 - 83.1
Health zones
Zone 1 - Moncton and South-East Area
78.0
68.9 - 87.0
Zone 2 - Fundy Shore and Saint John Area
85.9
79.7 - 92.1
Zone 3 - Fredericton and River Valley Area
78.9
72.5 - 85.4
Zone 4 - Madawaska and North-West Area
47.0
29.1 - 64.8
Zone 5 - Restigouche Area
88.5
81.0 - 96.1
Zone 6 - Bathurst and Acadian Peninsula Area
81.1
71.0 - 91.2
Zone 7 - Miramichi Area
81.0
67.4 - 94.6
Communities
Bathurst, Beresford, Petit-Rocher Area
S
Bouctouche, Richibucto, Saint-Antoine Area
S
Campbellton, Atholville, Tide Head Area
S
Caraquet, Paquetville, Bertrand Area
S
Dalhousie, Balmoral, Belledune Area
85.3
76.1 - 94.5
Dieppe and Memramcook
S
Douglas, Saint Marys, Doaktown Area
S
Edmundston, Rivière-Verte, Lac Baker Area
S
Florenceville-Bristol, Woodstock, Wakefield Area
S
Fredericton
86.2
75.3 - 97.2
Grand Bay-Westfield, Westfield, Greenwich Area
S
Grand Falls, Saint-Léonard, Drummond Area
S
Hillsborough, Riverside-Albert, Alma Area
S
Kedgwick, Saint-Quentin and Grimmer
S
Minto, Chipman, Cambridge-Narrows Area
S
Miramichi, Rogersville, Blackville Area
S
Moncton
S
Nackawic, McAdam, Canterbury Area
S
Neguac, Alnwick, Esgenoopetitj Area
S
New Maryland, Kingsclear, Lincoln Area
S
Oromocto, Gagetown, Fredericton Junction Area
S
Perth-Andover, Plaster Rock, Tobique Area
S
Quispamsis, Rothesay, Hampton Area
S
Riverview and Coverdale
S
Sackville, Dorchester, Port Elgin Area
S
Saint John, Simonds and Musquash
87.1
75.5 - 98.7
Salisbury and Petitcodiac
S
Shediac, Beaubassin East and Cap-Pelé
S
Shippagan, Lamèque, Inkerman Area
S
St. George, Grand Manan, Blacks Harbour Area
86.1
75.4 - 96.8
St. Stephen, Saint Andrews, Campobello Island Area
S
Sussex, Norton, Sussex Corner Area
S
Tracadie and Saint-Isidore
S
Age
18-64
72.4
67.7 - 77.1
65 and over
84.9
79.9 - 89.9
Sex at birth
Female
75.8
71.6 - 80.1
Male
74.5
67.5 - 81.4
Sexual identity
Minority sexual identity
S
Heterosexual
73.1
69.2 - 76.9
Language
Preferred language of service: English
75.4
71.0 - 79.8
Preferred language of service: French
74.0
66.8 - 81.2
Indigenous identity
Indigenous
S
Non-Indigenous
72.6
68.8 - 76.4
Immigrant
Immigrants
75.0
60.7 - 89.3
Non-immigrants
77.8
74.2 - 81.5
Education level
High school or less
72.0
66.2 - 77.9
Postsecondary
78.3
73.8 - 82.9
Household income
Less than $25,000
79.6
72.1 - 87.1
$25,000 to less than $60,000
71.8
65.5 - 78.1
$60,000 or more
76.7
70.8 - 82.6
Persons with a disability
Without disability
80.9
77.0 - 84.9
With disability
72.9
65.9 - 79.8
n/a = Not applicable / not available
S = Data suppressed due to confidentiality requirements and/or small sample size

About

This indicator is the percentage of citizens [with a nurse practitioner as their primary care provider] who reported that their nurse practitioner always involves them in decisions about their health care.

Source

New Brunswick Health Council, Primary Health Survey and Primary Care Survey

Calculations

This indicator is based on respondents who have a nurse practitioner as their primary care provider . This indicator is calculated by dividing the number of respondents who answered "always" by the number of respondents who answered "never, rarely, sometimes, usually or always" to the question: When you need care or treatment, how often does your family doctor or nurse practitioner involve you in decisions about your health care?

Notes

Due to changes in content and methodology, this indicator has been discontinued. The following indicator(s) are related to this one and can be typed into the indicator search box on our website: PC_CEXDH_1. The 2020 edition of the Primary Health Survey (PHS) was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. While the pandemic did not influence the survey’s response rate, NBHC had to assess the impact of surveying during the pandemic. Accordingly, advanced statistical analyses were performed to allow for comparison between the results obtained in 2020 and those obtained in previous PHS cycles. Despite these analyses, users are advised to use the PHS 2020 data with caution, especially when creating estimates for small sub-populations or when comparing it to other PHS editions.

Unit

%

NBHC code

PH_APPNA_2

Charts

Maps