CSV PDF

Citizens who felt they needed to see or talk to a health professional about their mental or emotional health, or about the use of alcohol or drugs in the last 12 months and but did not because of reasons other than those listed in the questionnaire

CSV PDF

Table

Unit %

Year 2022
Province
New Brunswick
29.3
23.5 - 35.1
Health zones
Zone 1 - Moncton and South-East Area
28.3
18.9 - 37.7
Zone 2 - Fundy Shore and Saint John Area
34.4
22.8 - 46.0
Zone 3 - Fredericton and River Valley Area
20.1
7.3 - 32.9
Zone 4 - Madawaska and North-West Area
S
Zone 5 - Restigouche Area
S
Zone 6 - Bathurst and Acadian Peninsula Area
S
Zone 7 - Miramichi Area
S
Communities
Bathurst, Beresford, Petit-Rocher Area
n/a
Bouctouche, Richibucto, Saint-Antoine Area
n/a
Campbellton, Atholville, Tide Head Area
n/a
Caraquet, Paquetville, Bertrand Area
n/a
Dalhousie, Balmoral, Belledune Area
n/a
Dieppe and Memramcook
n/a
Douglas, Saint Marys, Doaktown Area
n/a
Edmundston, Rivière-Verte, Lac Baker Area
n/a
Florenceville-Bristol, Woodstock, Wakefield Area
n/a
Fredericton
n/a
Grand Bay-Westfield, Westfield, Greenwich Area
n/a
Grand Falls, Saint-Léonard, Drummond Area
n/a
Hillsborough, Riverside-Albert, Alma Area
n/a
Kedgwick, Saint-Quentin and Grimmer
n/a
Minto, Chipman, Cambridge-Narrows Area
n/a
Miramichi, Rogersville, Blackville Area
n/a
Moncton
n/a
Nackawic, McAdam, Canterbury Area
n/a
Neguac, Alnwick, Esgenoopetitj Area
n/a
New Maryland, Kingsclear, Lincoln Area
n/a
Oromocto, Gagetown, Fredericton Junction Area
n/a
Perth-Andover, Plaster Rock, Tobique Area
n/a
Quispamsis, Rothesay, Hampton Area
n/a
Riverview and Coverdale
n/a
Sackville, Dorchester, Port Elgin Area
n/a
Saint John, Simonds and Musquash
n/a
Salisbury and Petitcodiac
n/a
Shediac, Beaubassin East and Cap-Pelé
n/a
Shippagan, Lamèque, Inkerman Area
n/a
St. George, Grand Manan, Blacks Harbour Area
n/a
St. Stephen, Saint Andrews, Campobello Island Area
n/a
Sussex, Norton, Sussex Corner Area
n/a
Tracadie and Saint-Isidore
n/a
Age
18-64
28.8
22.5 - 35.0
65 and over
34.9
24.0 - 45.8
Gender
Woman/Girl
29.8
23.4 - 36.3
Man/Boy
29.3
19.7 - 38.9
Sexual identity
Minority sexual identity
S
Heterosexual
29.8
23.8 - 35.9
Language
Preferred language of service: English
n/a
Preferred language of service: French
n/a
Indigenous identity
Indigenous
S
Non-Indigenous
30.0
24.0 - 35.9
Immigrant
Immigrants
S
Non-immigrants
29.9
23.8 - 36.1
Education level
High school or less
32.4
20.7 - 44.0
Postsecondary
27.8
21.2 - 34.4
Household income
Less than $25,000
30.4
12.8 - 48.1
$25,000 to less than $60,000
30.2
20.1 - 40.2
$60,000 or more
24.5
17.1 - 32.0
Persons with a disability
Without disability
28.8
21.7 - 35.8
With disability
32.7
22.2 - 43.3
n/a = Not applicable / not available
S = Data suppressed due to confidentiality requirements and/or small sample size

About

This indicator is the percentage of citizens who felt they needed to see or talk to a health professional about their mental or emotional health, or about the use of alcohol or drugs in the last 12 months and but did not because of reasons other than those listed in the questionnaire.

Source

New Brunswick Health Council, Primary Health Survey and Primary Care Survey

Calculations

This indicator is based on respondents who have felt that they needed to see or talk to a health professional in the last 12 months about their mental or emotional health, or their use of alcohol or drugs and who didn’t. This indicator is calculated by dividing the number of respondents who answered "yes" by the number of respondents who answered "yes or no" to the question: In the last 12 months, why didn’t you see or talk to a doctor, nurse or other health professional about your mental or emotional health, or about the use of alcohol or drugs? i) Other, please specify

Notes

The 2020 edition of the Primary Health Survey (PHS) was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. While the pandemic did not influence the survey’s response rate, NBHC had to assess the impact of surveying during the pandemic. Accordingly, advanced statistical analyses were performed to allow for comparison between the results obtained in 2020 and those obtained in previous PHS cycles. Despite these analyses, users are advised to use the PHS 2020 data with caution, especially when creating estimates for small sub-populations or when comparing it to other PHS editions.

Unit

%

Interpretation

Lower is better

NBHC code

PH_MHI06_10

Charts

Maps