CSV PDF

[DISCONTINUED] Citizens with a nurse practitioner who saw their nurse practitioner and give a favourable rating of 8, 9 or 10 for services received from their nurse practitioner in the last 12 months [scale 0-10]

CSV PDF

Table

Unit %

Year 2020 Year 2017 Year 2014 Year 2011
Province
New Brunswick
82.0
79.8 - 84.3
88.2
86.6 - 89.8
91.3
89.5 - 93.2
90.6
88.2 - 92.9
Health zones
Zone 1 - Moncton and South-East Area
83.1
78.4 - 87.8
87.6
84.2 - 91.0
83.6
78.7 - 88.6
86.9
81.7 - 92.2
Zone 2 - Fundy Shore and Saint John Area
79.0
73.3 - 84.8
89.1
85.3 - 92.8
96.7
94.6 - 98.8
90.2
85.6 - 94.8
Zone 3 - Fredericton and River Valley Area
80.1
75.4 - 84.8
84.9
81.2 - 88.6
96.4
93.8 - 99.0
92.2
86.8 - 97.7
Zone 4 - Madawaska and North-West Area
77.8
69.2 - 86.5
86.6
81.5 - 91.6
79.4
69.2 - 89.6
S
Zone 5 - Restigouche Area
78.4
70.6 - 86.2
87.8
80.9 - 94.7
S
S
Zone 6 - Bathurst and Acadian Peninsula Area
93.5
89.4 - 97.7
94.6
91.4 - 97.8
93.7
88.1 - 99.4
96.1
91.8 - 100.0
Zone 7 - Miramichi Area
85.2
76.0 - 94.3
94.8
89.2 - 100.0
S
88.4
79.0 - 97.9
Communities
Bathurst, Beresford, Petit-Rocher Area
96.3
91.1 - 100.0
92.1
86.5 - 97.7
S
S
Bouctouche, Richibucto, Saint-Antoine Area
88.6
79.2 - 98.0
88.1
78.5 - 97.6
S
S
Campbellton, Atholville, Tide Head Area
S
S
S
S
Caraquet, Paquetville, Bertrand Area
S
S
S
S
Dalhousie, Balmoral, Belledune Area
74.8
65.4 - 84.1
85.2
76.0 - 94.4
S
S
Dieppe and Memramcook
85.3
72.6 - 97.9
S
S
S
Douglas, Saint Marys, Doaktown Area
79.8
65.9 - 93.7
93.6
86.8 - 100.0
S
S
Edmundston, Rivière-Verte, Lac Baker Area
81.7
70.7 - 92.6
90.6
85.0 - 96.2
80.6
68.2 - 93.1
S
Florenceville-Bristol, Woodstock, Wakefield Area
S
S
S
S
Fredericton
85.8
76.6 - 94.9
80.6
71.0 - 90.2
S
S
Grand Bay-Westfield, Westfield, Greenwich Area
S
S
S
S
Grand Falls, Saint-Léonard, Drummond Area
S
S
S
S
Hillsborough, Riverside-Albert, Alma Area
S
S
S
S
Kedgwick, Saint-Quentin and Grimmer
S
S
S
S
Minto, Chipman, Cambridge-Narrows Area
S
S
S
S
Miramichi, Rogersville, Blackville Area
85.3
75.2 - 95.5
94.0
87.3 - 100.0
S
S
Moncton
77.6
65.1 - 90.0
74.3
63.2 - 85.3
74.2
60.6 - 87.8
78.0
65.6 - 90.4
Nackawic, McAdam, Canterbury Area
73.6
58.4 - 88.9
S
S
S
Neguac, Alnwick, Esgenoopetitj Area
S
S
n/a
S
New Maryland, Kingsclear, Lincoln Area
82.9
71.6 - 94.1
83.6
72.6 - 94.7
S
S
Oromocto, Gagetown, Fredericton Junction Area
72.2
59.4 - 85.0
81.9
72.2 - 91.7
S
S
Perth-Andover, Plaster Rock, Tobique Area
S
83.6
73.0 - 94.2
S
S
Quispamsis, Rothesay, Hampton Area
S
S
S
S
Riverview and Coverdale
74.9
59.7 - 90.2
96.8
91.4 - 100.0
S
S
Sackville, Dorchester, Port Elgin Area
94.1
86.8 - 100.0
88.3
80.8 - 95.8
S
S
Saint John, Simonds and Musquash
80.1
69.0 - 91.3
85.2
77.1 - 93.3
98.2
95.6 - 100.0
81.2
70.0 - 92.3
Salisbury and Petitcodiac
S
S
S
S
Shediac, Beaubassin East and Cap-Pelé
85.8
73.7 - 97.9
95.8
90.1 - 100.0
100.0
100.0 - 100.0
S
Shippagan, Lamèque, Inkerman Area
95.0
88.4 - 100.0
99.2
96.4 - 100.0
S
S
St. George, Grand Manan, Blacks Harbour Area
94.6
88.7 - 100.0
91.7
85.5 - 97.8
97.2
93.8 - 100.0
93.8
87.9 - 99.7
St. Stephen, Saint Andrews, Campobello Island Area
74.9
62.0 - 87.7
S
S
S
Sussex, Norton, Sussex Corner Area
S
S
S
S
Tracadie and Saint-Isidore
S
S
S
S
Age
18-64
80.7
77.7 - 83.6
87.9
86.0 - 89.8
91.2
89.1 - 93.4
89.5
86.7 - 92.4
65 and over
87.5
84.3 - 90.8
89.3
86.3 - 92.3
91.9
88.3 - 95.5
95.4
92.0 - 98.9
Sex at birth
Female
84.3
81.8 - 86.9
89.1
87.2 - 91.0
89.8
87.5 - 92.0
92.8
90.4 - 95.2
Male
79.7
75.3 - 84.0
87.0
83.9 - 90.0
94.5
91.5 - 97.5
85.4
79.7 - 91.1
Sexual identity
Minority sexual identity
79.8
67.8 - 91.8
n/a
n/a
n/a
Heterosexual
82.5
80.2 - 84.9
n/a
n/a
n/a
Language
Preferred language of service: English
81.4
78.6 - 84.2
86.6
84.5 - 88.7
91.7
89.6 - 93.7
89.6
86.8 - 92.4
Preferred language of service: French
85.5
81.6 - 89.4
90.8
88.1 - 93.5
90.9
86.5 - 95.2
93.6
89.3 - 97.8
Indigenous identity
Indigenous
69.5
55.3 - 83.8
85.5
78.0 - 93.0
S
S
Non-Indigenous
82.4
80.1 - 84.7
88.7
87.0 - 90.3
91.8
90.0 - 93.6
91.1
88.8 - 93.5
Immigrant
Immigrants
76.6
65.8 - 87.4
89.4
82.3 - 96.6
n/a
n/a
Non-immigrants
83.4
81.1 - 85.6
88.5
86.8 - 90.1
n/a
n/a
Education level
High school or less
76.9
73.1 - 80.8
87.2
84.6 - 89.7
90.1
86.9 - 93.3
86.7
82.5 - 90.8
Postsecondary
86.3
83.6 - 88.9
89.4
87.3 - 91.5
91.9
89.7 - 94.2
93.1
90.4 - 95.8
Household income
Less than $25,000
72.8
66.9 - 78.7
88.0
84.6 - 91.4
84.4
79.3 - 89.5
91.1
86.7 - 95.5
$25,000 to less than $60,000
84.1
80.4 - 87.8
87.5
84.7 - 90.2
93.6
90.9 - 96.4
90.0
85.7 - 94.4
$60,000 or more
86.9
83.7 - 90.1
89.7
87.1 - 92.3
94.1
91.6 - 96.6
90.6
86.6 - 94.6
Persons with a disability
Without disability
84.8
82.2 - 87.4
89.1
87.2 - 90.9
91.5
89.3 - 93.6
n/a
With disability
76.4
72.1 - 80.7
85.5
82.0 - 89.0
90.8
87.3 - 94.4
n/a
n/a = Not applicable / not available
S = Data suppressed due to confidentiality requirements and/or small sample size

About

This indicator is the percentage of citizens [with a nurse practitioner who saw their nurse practitioner] and give a favourable rating of 8, 9 or 10 for services received from their nurse practitioner in the last 12 months [scale 0-10].

Source

New Brunswick Health Council, Primary Health Survey and Primary Care Survey

Calculations

This indicator is based on respondents who have a nurse practitioner and who saw their nurse practitioner in the last 12 months . This indicator is calculated by dividing the number of respondents who answered "8, 9 or 10" by the number of respondents who answered "0 to 10" to the question: Overall, using any number from 0 to 10, where 0 is the worst health care possible and 10 is the best health care possible, what number would you use to rate the health care service you received in the past 12 months from: (nurse practitioner)

Notes

Due to changes in content and methodology, this indicator has been discontinued. The 2020 edition of the Primary Health Survey (PHS) was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. While the pandemic did not influence the survey’s response rate, NBHC had to assess the impact of surveying during the pandemic. Accordingly, advanced statistical analyses were performed to allow for comparison between the results obtained in 2020 and those obtained in previous PHS cycles. Despite these analyses, users are advised to use the PHS 2020 data with caution, especially when creating estimates for small sub-populations or when comparing it to other PHS editions.

Unit

%

NBHC code

PH_SATNB_1

Charts

Maps