CSV PDF

Citizens [with a nurse practitioner as their primary care provider who saw their nurse practitioner] and give a favourable rating of 8, 9 or 10 for services received from their nurse practitioner in the last 12 months [scale 0-10]

CSV PDF

Table

Unit %

Year 2020
Province
New Brunswick
79.8
76.4 - 83.2
Health zones
Zone 1 - Moncton and South-East Area
70.7
60.7 - 80.8
Zone 2 - Fundy Shore and Saint John Area
76.5
68.7 - 84.3
Zone 3 - Fredericton and River Valley Area
80.4
73.9 - 86.8
Zone 4 - Madawaska and North-West Area
S
Zone 5 - Restigouche Area
94.6
89.4 - 99.7
Zone 6 - Bathurst and Acadian Peninsula Area
89.1
81.1 - 97.1
Zone 7 - Miramichi Area
83.3
70.0 - 96.7
Communities
Bathurst, Beresford, Petit-Rocher Area
S
Bouctouche, Richibucto, Saint-Antoine Area
S
Campbellton, Atholville, Tide Head Area
S
Caraquet, Paquetville, Bertrand Area
S
Dalhousie, Balmoral, Belledune Area
84.4
75.3 - 93.4
Dieppe and Memramcook
S
Douglas, Saint Marys, Doaktown Area
S
Edmundston, Rivière-Verte, Lac Baker Area
S
Florenceville-Bristol, Woodstock, Wakefield Area
S
Fredericton
81.4
68.2 - 94.7
Grand Bay-Westfield, Westfield, Greenwich Area
S
Grand Falls, Saint-Léonard, Drummond Area
S
Hillsborough, Riverside-Albert, Alma Area
S
Kedgwick, Saint-Quentin and Grimmer
S
Minto, Chipman, Cambridge-Narrows Area
S
Miramichi, Rogersville, Blackville Area
S
Moncton
S
Nackawic, McAdam, Canterbury Area
S
Neguac, Alnwick, Esgenoopetitj Area
S
New Maryland, Kingsclear, Lincoln Area
S
Oromocto, Gagetown, Fredericton Junction Area
S
Perth-Andover, Plaster Rock, Tobique Area
S
Quispamsis, Rothesay, Hampton Area
S
Riverview and Coverdale
S
Sackville, Dorchester, Port Elgin Area
S
Saint John, Simonds and Musquash
78.0
63.2 - 92.8
Salisbury and Petitcodiac
S
Shediac, Beaubassin East and Cap-Pelé
S
Shippagan, Lamèque, Inkerman Area
S
St. George, Grand Manan, Blacks Harbour Area
94.8
87.8 - 100.0
St. Stephen, Saint Andrews, Campobello Island Area
S
Sussex, Norton, Sussex Corner Area
S
Tracadie and Saint-Isidore
S
Age
18-64
72.0
67.2 - 76.9
65 and over
83.9
78.7 - 89.1
Sex at birth
Female
78.0
73.8 - 82.2
Male
70.6
63.2 - 78.0
Sexual identity
Minority sexual identity
S
Heterosexual
72.1
68.1 - 76.0
Language
Preferred language of service: English
72.8
68.2 - 77.5
Preferred language of service: French
81.5
75.1 - 87.8
Indigenous identity
Indigenous
S
Non-Indigenous
71.9
67.9 - 75.8
Immigrant
Immigrants
71.8
56.2 - 87.4
Non-immigrants
78.2
74.6 - 81.9
Education level
High school or less
72.9
67.0 - 78.7
Postsecondary
77.1
72.4 - 81.9
Household income
Less than $25,000
69.8
60.9 - 78.6
$25,000 to less than $60,000
75.7
69.6 - 81.8
$60,000 or more
78.9
73.1 - 84.6
Persons with a disability
Without disability
81.4
77.5 - 85.4
With disability
72.1
65.0 - 79.3
n/a = Not applicable / not available
S = Data suppressed due to confidentiality requirements and/or small sample size

About

This indicator is the percentage of citizens [with a nurse practitioner as their primary care provider who saw their nurse practitioner] and give a favourable rating of 8, 9 or 10 for services received from their nurse practitioner in the last 12 months [scale 0-10].

Source

New Brunswick Health Council, Primary Health Survey and Primary Care Survey

Calculations

This indicator is based on respondents who have a nurse practitioner as their primary care provider and who saw their nurse practitioner in the last 12 months . This indicator is calculated by dividing the number of respondents who answered "8, 9 or 10" by the number of respondents who answered "0 to 10" to the question: Overall, using any number from 0 to 10, where 0 is the worst health care possible and 10 is the best health care possible, what number would you use to rate the health care service you received in the past 12 months from: (nurse practitioner)

Notes

The 2020 edition of the Primary Health Survey (PHS) was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. While the pandemic did not influence the survey’s response rate, NBHC had to assess the impact of surveying during the pandemic. Accordingly, advanced statistical analyses were performed to allow for comparison between the results obtained in 2020 and those obtained in previous PHS cycles. Despite these analyses, users are advised to use the PHS 2020 data with caution, especially when creating estimates for small sub-populations or when comparing it to other PHS editions.

Unit

%

Interpretation

Higher is better

NBHC code

PH_SATNB_2

Charts

Maps